The deployment of facial recognition-equipped police vans in parts of Delhi has triggered fresh criticism from student groups and activists, who allege that the move contradicts earlier assurances that no punitive action would be taken against students participating in peaceful demonstrations.
Several protest organizers shared images and videos on social media claiming that the surveillance vehicles were stationed near protest sites, raising concerns about the collection and use of biometric data. The slogan “Jhutha Hai Tera Wada” (Your promise was false) began trending among demonstrators, who accused the authorities of reneging on their commitment to avoid action against students.
Student representatives argued that the presence of facial recognition technology could have a chilling effect on peaceful protests, discouraging students from exercising their democratic right to assemble and voice their concerns. They demanded greater transparency regarding the purpose of the surveillance, the handling of collected data, and the legal safeguards in place to protect privacy.
Delhi Police, however, maintained that security arrangements were made to ensure law and order and public safety during the demonstrations. Officials said surveillance tools are deployed as part of standard policing measures in sensitive areas and are intended to assist in identifying individuals involved in unlawful activities, rather than targeting peaceful protesters.
The issue has also reignited a broader debate over the use of facial recognition technology in public spaces, with civil rights groups calling for stronger regulations and oversight to balance security requirements with citizens’ privacy and constitutional freedoms.
As protests continue, opposition leaders and rights advocates have urged the authorities to uphold previous assurances, while student organizations have demanded that any surveillance measures be proportionate, transparent, and consistent with the law.
