Trump Says Iran May be Linked to FlyDubai Copilot Who Tried to Crash Israel-Bound Jet

Washington: U.S. President Donald Trump has suggested that Iran could be linked to the FlyDubai co-pilot accused of attacking the captain and attempting to crash a passenger aircraft bound for Israel. Trump, however, did not provide evidence publicly and stressed that the matter remains under investigation.

The dramatic incident occurred on September 30 aboard FlyDubai Flight FZ1073, which was traveling from the United Arab Emirates to Tel Aviv with more than 180 people on board, most of them Israeli passengers. According to accounts cited by investigators and officials, the co-pilot allegedly attacked the Indian captain in the cockpit and caused the aircraft to enter a steep descent.

Asked at the White House whether he had received information connecting the co-pilot to Iran, Trump said officials were “working on it” but indicated that he believed there could be a connection.

When asked whether Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps could have been involved or whether the co-pilot might have been radicalized through Iranian influence, Trump responded that it “could’ve been.” He did not elaborate on the intelligence behind the suggestion.

Trump also warned that the United States would respond forcefully if Iranian involvement in the incident were established.

Passengers Helped Prevent a Disaster

The aircraft reportedly went into a dangerous descent after the captain was attacked. The wounded captain managed to open the cockpit door, allowing passengers and other crew members to intervene.

Passengers helped overpower the co-pilot while other pilots assisted in regaining control of the aircraft. The plane subsequently made an emergency landing in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

The incident could have resulted in a major loss of life had passengers and crew members not been able to intervene.

The Indian captain, identified as Smit Machchhar, was injured in the attack and was initially treated in Saudi Arabia before being transferred to Abu Dhabi for further medical care. India’s Ministry of External Affairs said it was closely monitoring his condition and that Indian officials were in contact with his family and local authorities.

Co-Pilot’s Identity and Motive Under Investigation

Authorities have not publicly released the co-pilot’s name. He has been described by officials as an Omani national and was taken into custody following the emergency landing.

Investigators from the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Israel are examining the circumstances surrounding the attack. The UAE has launched its own investigation because the aircraft is registered in the country and UAE law applies to crimes committed aboard the aircraft.

Several possible motives are being examined, including terrorism and other personal or ideological motivations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the suspect underwent Islamist radicalization, but details supporting that assertion have not been publicly established. Netanyahu also said it was too early to determine whether Iran was responsible.

Iran Connection Remains Unproven

Trump’s comments have added a significant geopolitical dimension to an incident that investigators are still attempting to understand. At present, a direct Iranian role has not been publicly established.

The investigation is also examining whether the suspect acted alone, how he was able to carry out the attack inside the cockpit and whether there were security failures that allowed the incident to occur.

The incident comes amid already heightened tensions between the United States, Israel and Iran. Any verified evidence linking Tehran to the attempted attack could have broader diplomatic and security consequences, particularly given the ongoing conflict in the region.

For now, investigators are continuing to establish the suspect’s motive, possible affiliations and the precise sequence of events that led to the aircraft’s emergency landing in Saudi Arabia.

The key question remains: Was the attack the act of an individual who had been radicalized, or was there a wider organization or state connection? Authorities have yet to provide a definitive answer.

Share This Article