The Delhi High Court on Sunday (July 19, 2026) refused to grant interim relief to climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, meaning he will continue to remain at Safdarjung Hospital while the case is pending.
What the court said
- Justice Mini Pushkarna held that the government’s decision to shift Wangchuk from his hunger strike at Jantar Mantar to Safdarjung Hospital was not arbitrary, given his deteriorating health.
- The court observed that Wangchuk had not voluntarily admitted himself to a hospital, so authorities were within their rights to move him for medical care.
- It also noted that doctors are closely monitoring his condition and that only oral medicines and supplements administered with his consent have been given, finding no evidence that force was being used or that his bodily autonomy had been violated.
Why the petition was filed
- The plea was filed by Wangchuk’s wife, Dr. Gitanjali J. Angmo, seeking his transfer from Safdarjung Hospital to a private hospital of the family’s choice.
- She raised concerns about the treatment and transparency regarding his medical care.
Government’s stand
- The Centre told the High Court that Wangchuk is not under detention.
- It informed the court that his family—including his wife and close relatives—has unrestricted access to meet him at the hospital, and a separate room has been arranged for them.
What happens next
The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Centre, Delhi Police and other respondents, directing them to file status reports. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on July 24, 2026. Until then, Wangchuk will continue receiving treatment at Safdarjung Hospital.
